an outstanding user experience

| 3 Comments | No TrackBacks

Is it sad that I just had an amazing user experience by a totally automated system? Surprised the hell out of me I will admit.

As I'll be out of the office for a week or so I had stumbled about on the website of our local daily newspaper looking for the form they used to have (which has now disappeared) and was a little irritated at having to actually "phone" them to request a vacation delivery stoppage. Once connected to reception the automated system informed me of a 5 minute wait for a customer service rep (yikes), or, "she" could help me with the following things - vacation hold being one of them. What the heck I figured, I'll give Sally the Voice a go.

The cool thing was that it was all voice recognition stuff, no punching in numbers at all. Simply speaking "vacation hold" after the list of items selected that option, then she requested my phone number to be spoken to her, and then my house number. After that she wanted to know the date of stoppage and the date to resume. What cracked me up were the responses from her, they varied from "got it" to "thank you" to "great, thanks". And even funnier was the fake typing noise when she responded with "just a sec while I check the system for your account (insert fake typing noise here)" and "entering your request into the system now (more fake typing noise)". Too funny.

Very smooth and easy to use and the whole process left me with a "huh - now why can't all customer service calls be that easy and cool". Coolness aside though - let's just hope it works.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.elektrikink.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/217

3 Comments

Oh man, I hate those things! If you want the opposite of a good customer experience, try using Rogers' AVR system, Melanie. It's horrible. I think my last transaction went a little something like this (my side only...):

"Account balance."

"No."

"Account balance."

"No!"

"ACCOUNT. BALANCE."

"&%#(@! NO!!!"

"ACCOUNTBALANCE ACCOUNTBALANCE ACCOUNTBALANCE!!!"

"AAAAAAAARRRRRGGGGH!!!!!!!"

Haha, that's funny stuff, I haven't had one with (added) fake typing sounds yet! :D

I empathise with Ben though: my last encounter with one of these 'voice-automated' services was much closer to his description.

>>"Coolness aside though - let's just hope it works."

Yeah, that's the key thing in the end. It has to work or it's a massive fail. Seems like your experience was at least a good one this time.

One of the things I don't like so much about the 'voice-automated' services is the heavy reliance on the need to be in a quiet, easy-to-hear environment when you make the call (and that's not always the case when you make calls these days, especially with mobile phones/cellphones).

Take Ben's comment - how much worse would it have been if he was calling from a train station, an airport, or from a bar somewhere? This is ultimately why I'm not a big fan of that sort of 'voice-automation' for calls.

To be honest, Ben, I totally expected an experience similar to yours - it is our local daily rag as you know. Vacation hold requests are always hit or miss with them so we'll see how this "new and improved" system works (insert fake typing noises here ;) )

And Matt, that's true. I was in a relatively quiet office setting so background noise wasn't an issue.

All in all, it was a pleasant experience.

Leave a comment

Archives

www.flickr.com


Visit my flickr photostream.